Special Meeting 1/25/2018

 

 

IGA Contract 9/11/2018

 

 

Financial History of the District

 

 

First Meeting 12/16/2019

 

 

Second Meeting 1/20/2020

 

 

Third Meeting 2/17/2020

 

 

Third Meeting 3/2/2020

 

 

Fourth Meeting

 

 

 

On October 15, 2019, I received a yellow postcard in the mail that read:

 

 

Be a part of the Rockland Fire Protection District’s CITIZENS REVIEW COMMITTEE.

 

The purpose of the committee is to provide transparency and objective facts about the outsourcing of our fire services:

 

How we got to where we are today

Current and future financial impact

Current state of operations

 

If you are interested in facts

If you’re willing to help with research

If you can commit to attending 4 meetings over 3-4 months

WE WANT YOU TO APPLY!

 

For information or to volunteer, email Amy Bernstein at…

 

 

Underscore in the original; boldface mine – though I thought all facts were objective.  Being a person always interested in objective facts, I responded and on the morning of November 12th I received an email from Secretary Bernstein informing me that I had been chosen and that our first meeting would be on December 16th.

On December 16th I arrived to find assigned seating with a 3-ring notebook at each place displaying a committee member’s name on its cover.  The tables were arranged in a “U” shape so that a video camera could view the three members of the board and the treasurer at the head tables with committee members facing each other on the left and right of the field of view.

Across from my seat was the vacant seat of an absent member, Mr. William Stein, Mr. Wayne Spath and Ms. Heather Grum.  On my left was Mr. Chris Johnson and on my right was Ms. Theresa Yakes and Mr. Bill Knesley.

Board President Malinowski took attendance and conducted the Pledge.  Then Secretary Bernstein took us through THE PAGES OF THE NOTEBOOK:

The CRC Mission Statement, with which she began, concludes, “The role of the CRC is to fact find and analyze information to assist RFPD trustees into building a factual account and transparent report to be prepared by counsel and presented to the community for review.”

So the end result of the Committee’s effort will be a report that will be published and publicized.  It was not clear to me how counsel would accurately reflect the findings of the Committee, nor if the Committee would have any editorial veto of the counsel’s report.

The CRC Guiding Principles include:

Take personal responsibility for the quality of our community

Act with integrity, accountability and in the best interest of all

Be inclusive, welcoming and open-minded

Interact with respect and civility in all circumstances

Embrace a positive, forward looking orientation

#4 “respect and civility” hereinafter R&C is worrisome.  It is often used by Social Justice Warriors to impose Political Correctness, along with cries of “inappropriateness.”  But whatever, man.  I’m down with R&C.

Reading from the Scope of the CRC pages, Secretary Bernstein quoted her own comments (advocating the creation of the CRC) from the board meeting last July, “…I asked the question, where I could find copies of the studies or assessments of the process leading up to the closing…Former Trustee Snoblin responded with, there are no studies, they do not exist…I intend to answer the following questions in three Sections:  Financial…Operations…Disposition of assets and general review.”

The first three points listed for the financial section were (1) What is the financial impact of outsourcing services vs. what was established as the former Knollwood Fire Department, (2) what are the current operating costs vs. prior to Oct. 2018, and (3) what will the future costs be for the RFPD for the next 5 years?

I think this is crucial.  RFPD is not a community center.  It has no business spending the taxpayers’ money on “making Knollwood a friendly, happy place.”  It is a tax district.  Its sole mission is to provide adequate fire & rescue for the minimal price.  I think much of the festering anger flows from a fundamental misunderstanding of what the RFPD is.

Reviewing the six-page RESOLUTION 2019-02 that established the CRC, Member Grum (a different person from Secretary Grum) noticed (on page 2 of 6) that we would “research” the “termination of District employees.”  She asked if they would be reinstated or if we would initiate a lawsuit to have them reinstated.  She was told, “We cannot answer that yet” and was referred to the thumb drive that was included in our notebook that held an audio recording of a special meeting of the board.

“Yet” is ominous.  My greatest fear is that we will spend our money to sue ourselves.  If that happens then, win or lose, we lose.

At the time that the outsourcing was being considered, the Rockland Board consisted of three appointed trustees:  President Rogers, Secretary Grum and Trustee Snoblin – the Rogers Board.  The first page following the “background” tab of our notebooks is Trustee Appointment which observes that County Board President Arron Lawlor, District 12 Representative Mike Rummel and District 13 Representative Sandy Hardt [sic] do not live within the Rockland District.

Crimeny.  Sandy Hart lives in the Lake Bluff house I lived in for decades so she is our neighbor.  When she was elected a year ago by the county board members to be President of the Lake County Board, she became the first Democrat to ever hold that office and she was elected by people of the Rockland District.  We were not told who prepared the pages of the notebook, but whoever it was, that person was clueless.  We really should get the spelling of proper nouns right.  I wouldn’t call this a violation of R&C, it is just clueless, like the person who did it.

As to the appointment – trustees come from somewhere.  If they are not elected, they are appointed.  Exactly what authority does Clueless want to make the appointment if residency is required?  Just who?  Of course the county board members whose districts contain the RFPD should make the appointment.  Who else? And what does residency have to do with it?  This is such a petty complaint that it demeans the CRC to voice it.

In light of the outsourcing, there was a movement to have the Rockland trustees elected instead of appointed.  That change required a referendum that passed in April, 2017 though the trustees would not be elected until April, 2019.  (resulting in President Malinowski, Secretary Bernstein and Trustee Anderson – the Malinowski Board.)  The Referendum and Vote page of our notebooks noted that prior to the referendum, Dan Rogers wrote to district residents to influence the referendum.  He wrote as a private citizen (not as a board member) but he used an image of the Rockland Fire Department logo that made the letter seems like official letterhead.  Member Spath said he investigated the use of the logo and determined that there was “no violation” in its use.

Again, petty.  If this is a settled matter – the logo is a non-starter – then why bitch about it now?  If private-citizen Dan Rogers spent a considerable amount of personal funds to express his opinion to his neighbors on a matter of civic interest, isn’t that commendable?  Isn’t that grassroots democratic participation?

This complaint is not about civic engagement, nor is it about the logo.  It is simply a smear.  Clueless doesn’t like Dan Rogers.  Therefore anything Dan Rogers does is cast as improper by Clueless.  This is clearly a violation of R&C.

A year before the April 4, 2017 election that included the referendum, on April 6, 2016, the Libertyville Fire Chief sent an email to the Libertyville Village Manager that is explored on the Libertyville Fire Department Chief Email page which notes that then-President of the RFPD Board Ed Whitehead had no knowledge of his own pending replacement.  Secretary Bernstein emphasized the two questions at the bottom of that page:  (1) How does the Fire Chief of a neighboring town know that a board change is immanent? [sic] and (2) Further why does he believe that the RFPD will approach for [sic] a proposal to take over services?

I wonder how Clueless got out of middle school with such lame spelling and grammar.  Is this why we pay counsel to write the final report – to clean it up?  Regardless, as to matters of substance, what is the accusation here?  Is Clueless implying some kind of conspiracy theory?  And even if so, how does that bear on the virtue of outsourcing?    As President Malinowski explained, Illinois has many line-items on the real estate tax bill and each has its own board.  There is an entirely rational push to consolidate those line-items.  Debate is necessary and good.  Suppressing debate is censorship, or worse:  Political Correctness. 

Secretary Bernstein suggested that there had been “inappropriate behavior” and Treasurer Snoblin said that “it had never been discussed by the board.”  Secretary Bernstein noted that Bob Grum was seated on the RFPD board on July 18, 2016.  Member Johnson noted the Mr. Grum worked for the Lake Forest Fire Department and would be acquainted with fire officials in neighboring towns.  He further commented that he believed there was nothing illegal about work-related communication between such acquaintances, “just inappropriate.”  Secretary Snoblin said that President Whitehead had reapplied but was ignored.

“Inappropriate” is nothing more than a way of saying, “You didn’t do anything wrong, but I don’t approve.”  Fine.  So what is the CRC to do with that?

The Inappropriate Behavior page notes that “In the Spring of 2016…Dan Rogers was already on the board” and “Robert Grum was appointed in May of 2016” but on April 15, 2016 he had written an email to the Libertyville Fire Chief about meetings regarding outsourcing which Secretary Bernstein characterized as a “violation of trust.”  The Libertyville Police and Fire Committee held a meeting on April 19, 2016 at which the Libertyville Fire Chief discusses a proposal to close the Knollwood Fire Department.  The After Appointment page quotes Secretary Grum at his first RFPD Board meeting on July 18, 2016 describing his meetings with the Libertyville Fire Chief.  Treasurer Snoblin said Secretary Grum “basically lied about the nature of the meetings.”

A “violation of trust” is a very serious accusation to those of us who take “trust” seriously.  So I would be very interested to know just where the violation occurred.  Specifically, why is it surprising that the person appointed to the Fire Board is a fire professional who engages with other fire people on fire topics?

The next page of our notebook contained only the following statement, printed so large that it took the entire page:

The next two slides indicate proof that Bob Grum and Dan Rogers are not working for the Knollwood/Sanctuary Community They are appointed agents for the Lake County Board

WTF.  How could Clueless possibly “prove” that Grum and Rogers are “not working for the…community?”

This is reckless.  The words exude a seething anger that has no place in public service.  If there is “proof” then just lay it out dispassionately.  If not, then STFU.  The CRC of the RFPD is not the place for emotional venting and it should not be tolerated.  How did this get into print?  Print so large that it took the entire page?

The next page (“slide”) Violation of Trust #1 draws conclusions about Secretary Grum’s meeting described in an email of the Libertyville Fire Chief on October 28, 2016 and his interaction with then-RFPD Board President Snoblin which implies that he should have had prior authorization.  The Violation of Trust #2 slide includes an email from (my nearby neighbor) Tim Hughes appealing to county representatives to reappoint him to the RFPD Board and Dan Rogers’ reaction in an email chain of March 10&11, 2016 which the slide characterizes as “suspect,” “unethical” and a “lie.”  Treasurer Snoblin commented that there were “50 emails sent to Lawlor” opposing Rogers appointment.

Violation of Trust #1 contemplates prior authorization.  But as a duly installed trustee he had independent authority and responsibility to research and inform himself on board-relevant matters.  Indeed, he had a due diligence obligation.

This alleged “violation” is just Clueless working backward from a conclusion to the precedent acts.  Having decided that outsourcing is a bad result, any act leading to that result is also bad.  The accusation is cruel and the application is illogical.

Violation of Trust #2 arises from Dan’s offer to “keep you informed” because the recipient is not a District resident and, as Clueless says, “Dan Rogers is supposed to keep the residents of Knollwood and the Sanctuary informed.”  So Dan is at fault for informing a non-resident?  Yes, says Clueless:  This behavior by Dan Rogers is suspect?”  (I’m not sure what the superfluous question mark is intended to do.)

(And then, Clueless misspells the county Board President’s name.)

“2nd, how unethical can Dan Rogers be.”  (Ah, so that’s where the question mark belongs.  Middle school, Clueless.)  Dan, advises Rummel on how to lie” is a grotesque distortion of what was written in the subject email.  Perhaps Clueless does not think that calling someone a liar is a big deal.  Perhaps because Clueless is a casual liar.  But no fair reading results in a conclusion that Dan is.

Both shrill and vapid, Clueless is in clear violation of R&C.  That Guiding Principle is absent from the Background section of the 3-ring notebooks.  Where’s the beef?  We are left with only the bitterness of sour grapes.

There was some discussion about the changed work environment that anticipated the outsourcing and resulting resignations.  Member Johnson commented on the IAFF union rules.

Still within the “background” tab of our notebooks, Secretary Bernstein reached a page that read simply “Financial Impact, proposals and contracts, future concerns.”

Proposal #1 Libertyville Fire Dept of July, 2016 and Proposal #2 Libertyville Fire Dept of January, 2017 represent internal discussion at Libertyville, both less than $400 thousand p.a.  New Board President Officially Discuses (sic) Consolidation cites a letter from President Rogers on July 20, 2017 that reads, “The RFPD Board of Trustees is asking the Village of Libertyville to submit an all inclusive proposal to take over all fire and rescue services…”  Member Johnson asked if it were an RFP and Treasurer Snoblin affirmed but called it informal.

A formal Proposal #3 Joint proposal Libertyville and Lake Forest Fire Dept is more than $500 thousand p.a. Member Grum noted.  Member Johnson observed that the only feasible service providers are North Chicago, Lake Forest and Libertyville, but not Lake Bluff, another volunteer department.  Treasurer Snoblin suggested that Libertyville did not have the capacity to service all Knollwood without response-time impact and had to partner with Lake Forest.

A January 5, 2018 email from President Rogers to the Libertyville Fire Chief presented in President Acts on his own requests return to the lower-priced single-department-provider proposal.  A January 9, 2018 email from the Libertyville Fire Chief presented on To (sic) Expensive indicated a willingness to lower the price.  Secretary Bernstein asserted that next year, the contract that is now in place will cost $515 thousand p.a. though she did not say how she came up with that number.  Treasurer Snoblin said an Executive Session of the board was improperly held using the excuse of “job related” which the attorney general rejected on February 2nd, ordering the minutes and video released – presumably the thumb drive contents.

The RFPD President is haggling over price, and effectively, as it turned out.  But Clueless is unhappy with both high prices and low prices, writing in “To (sic) Expensive” “Libertyville and Lake Forest gave a fee for what they feel the service will cost them.  Why would they lower the fee and keep it low.  But also:  What if they…raise” it?  The reason that the Open Meetings law allows Executive Session for discussion of pending contracts is to protect people like Dan from people like Clueless.

The volunteer fire department of Lake Bluff offered to merge with the volunteer fire department of Knollwood and to meet on that topic March 19th giving rise to Potential Inappropriate County Influence.  On March 6, 2018 President Rogers sent an email to the two county board members writing, “You both represent the area and I am inviting you to attend the meeting and discuss the proposal.”  Lake Forest area representative Mike Rummel attends but Lake Bluff area representative Sandy Hart Declines.

Dan writes, “You both represent the area and I am inviting you to attend the meeting and discuss the proposal.”  Clueless frets, “…why would Dan Rogers invite two Lake County Board members to this meeting?”  Merging the two volunteer departments is an alternative to outsourcing that preserves local operations, so isn’t Dan doing what Clueless wants?  “Does Dan Rogers have a clue what he’s doing?...How can we trust Dan Rogers to do the right thing to serve the community?”  The only thing consistent about Clueless is that Dan Rogers is always wrong – damned if he does, and damned if he doesn’t.

This is not helpful.  This does not direct the CRC toward “objective facts” nor does it conform to minimal R&C.

Of the three Important Points, the one emphasized by Treasurer Snoblin was that the RFPD Fire Chief was not involved in the Libertyville (& Lake Forest) proposals; only with the Lake Bluff merger.  He also criticized the public hearing at Gorton and noted that Secretary Bernstein had asked for response time studies.  Member Spath said there was no vote on the Lake Bluff proposal.  This marked the end of Secretary Bernstein’s reading from the 3-ring binder.

Treasurer Snoblin worried that the district would go bankrupt saying that three percent increases were necessary just to break even.  He said that in ten years, there would only be $260 thousand left, not including the disposition of the building.  He said that if we don’t increase the levy, we would go bankrupt.  He said that Libertyville and Lake Forest “knew what our levy capacity was” and “they priced it to break-even.”

These points are disputed on another page of these notes.  Fortunately, numbers are easy.  We must remember, however, that projections are not “objective facts.”

Treasurer Snoblin continued, saying that “both models are financially viable” to which Member Spath responded “finance is not what this is about.”  Treasurer Snoblin observed that in and around the RFPD there are “too many departments and too many [fire]trucks” but a limited number of firemen.  Member Spath inferred that if the volunteers of the Knollwood Fire Department are not available to assist neighboring district, “everybody suffers” – a sentiment echoed by Member Grum.

Treasurer Snoblin said that in January 2018 the League of Women Voters urged the (appointed) Rogers Board to defer any decision until the elected board (the Malinowski Board) was seated.  Also, in August 2018, the Sanctuary Homeowners Association made a similar appeal.  Members Grum and Stein grumbled that these two bodies were “ignored.”

Member Spath noted that “they say they didn’t do anything illegal” but went on to note that the State’s Attorney is a Republican and “this was driven by Republicans” – presumably President Rogers and Secretary Grum.  He then went on to say something about unfunded pensions and Republican coffers.

Perhaps encouraged by the tone of the background section of our notebooks, Member Spath goes a bit astray here.  He prefaced his remarks saying, “I don’t want to get political…” but that does not inoculate him from his own words.  Conspiracy theories, rumor mongering and flat-out propaganda should be disqualifying by the R&C standard.

The January 31, 2017 Chicago Tribune reported that the RFPD attorney specifically addressed the absurd suggestion that some unfunded pension of the Village of Libertyville will burden the RFPD contract.  Only the most gullible among us could think so.  It is undignified for Member Spath to exploit their ignorance.

Member Stein asked, “Did we ever figure out who was pulling the strings of Dan Rogers?”  He said that President Rogers said that he (Rogers) was “given this assignment (to outsource) four years earlier.”

“When did you stop beating your wife?”  That is the classical question used in law schools to illustrate an assumed premise that is false – “assumes facts not in evidence” as they say.  I sat through the whole CRC meeting and listened carefully.  I have read the whole notebook.  I am nobody’s fool.  I am not aware of any basis to believe that Dan Rogers is anyone’s marionette.  Quite the opposite; he is his own man.  It is unfair for Member Stein to imply otherwise.

Secretary Bernstein asked us to read the rest of the material in our 3-ring notebooks and President Malinowski set Monday, January 20, 2020 for our next meeting.  Member Johnson expressed a wish for response time from ’14, ’15, ’16 & ’17.  He and Treasurer Snoblin discussed how staffing in Lake Bluff changed in the absence of the Knollwood Fire Department.  Member Spath noted that Lake Forest does more to service Rockland than Libertyville, inconsistent with how the split their fee.  The meeting ended after an hour and a half.

 

 

 

 

Special Meeting 1/25/2018

 

 

IGA Contract 9/11/2018

 

 

Financial History of the District

 

 

First Meeting 12/16/2019

 

 

Second Meeting 1/20/2020

 

 

Third Meeting 2/17/2020

 

 

Third Meeting 3/2/2020

 

 

Fourth Meeting